Why Better Storm Risk Modeling Is Good News for Solar Project Finance
May 27, 2025
Solar insurance has had a pricing problem for years. Insurers struggled to accurately assess storm and hail risk for large-scale solar assets, which meant premiums were often blunt instruments rather than precise calculations. That’s starting to change.
Renew Risk recently launched a catastrophe modeling tool specifically designed to help insurers and reinsurers price the financial risk of severe convective storms for utility-scale solar projects. It’s a targeted response to a real gap in the market, and the downstream effects for project developers, asset owners, and corporate buyers of solar energy are worth paying attention to.
The Hail Problem Has Been Quietly Expensive
Hail damage is one of the most underappreciated risks in solar project development. A single severe convective storm can shatter hundreds of panels across a large array, triggering replacement costs, lost generation revenue, and drawn-out insurance claims. The losses are real and they’re not rare.
The challenge for insurers has been that solar assets don’t behave like buildings or crops when a hailstorm hits. Panel vulnerability depends on tilt angle, mounting height, module type, and a range of site-specific variables that traditional catastrophe models weren’t built to handle. Without good models, underwriters defaulted to conservative assumptions, which pushed premiums up across the board regardless of actual site risk.
For developers, this created a frustrating dynamic. Projects with strong site selection, quality equipment, and good engineering discipline were being priced similarly to projects with genuine exposure. The market wasn’t differentiating well, and that increased the cost of capital for everyone.
What Better Modeling Actually Changes
A purpose-built catastrophe model for solar assets does a few important things. It allows insurers to assess storm risk at a more granular level, factoring in historical weather patterns, geographic exposure, and asset-specific characteristics. That precision matters because it shifts the conversation from broad industry assumptions to site-level analysis.
When insurers can price risk more accurately, a few things tend to follow. Premiums for well-sited, well-engineered projects can come down, or at least stabilize, because the insurer has more confidence in what they’re covering. Reinsurance markets can also participate more efficiently, which deepens capacity and reduces the risk of coverage gaps during periods of high storm activity.
For project developers and independent power producers, this is meaningful. Insurance is a real line item in project pro formas. When it’s priced conservatively because the market lacks good data, it affects returns, financing terms, and sometimes whether a project gets built at all. More accurate modeling creates a path toward more rational pricing.
It also opens the door for developers to actively influence their insurance outcomes through better design choices. If the model rewards certain panel orientations, hail-resistant modules, or site configurations, developers have a financial incentive to invest in those features upfront.
What This Means for Project Development and Site Selection
The emergence of storm catastrophe modeling for solar should change how development teams think about site risk assessment. Historically, hail and severe convective storm exposure was often treated as a background factor, something noted in a project risk register but rarely quantified with precision. That approach is becoming harder to justify.
Developers who want to optimize financing terms and insurance costs will need to engage with storm risk earlier in the development process. That means pulling historical storm data during site selection, not after, and evaluating how geographic exposure interacts with the project’s technical design.
For utility-scale projects in the U.S., the risk profile varies significantly by region. The hail belt across Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and into the Midwest presents very different challenges than projects sited in the Southwest or Southeast. A model that captures this granularity gives developers better tools to make informed tradeoffs between land cost, solar resource quality, and storm exposure.
Corporate buyers of solar energy through power purchase agreements should also take note. When the project backing a PPA is better insured against storm risk, the long-term delivery reliability of that contract improves. That’s not a minor point for sustainability leaders who are counting on specific generation volumes to meet emissions reduction targets.
Early Planning Is Where the Value Gets Captured
Better catastrophe modeling tools are only useful if project teams engage with the insurance market early enough to act on what they learn. Too often, insurance is treated as a late-stage workstream, something to sort out once permits are secured and financing is nearly closed. That sequencing leaves money on the table.
When insurance underwriting conversations happen early, developers have options. They can adjust module specifications if a particular product carries lower hail resistance ratings. They can revisit tilt angles that increase panel exposure during storms. They can structure operations and maintenance agreements to ensure rapid response after storm events, which matters to insurers assessing total loss scenarios.
Financiers are paying closer attention to this as well. Lenders and tax equity investors want to know that a project’s revenue stream is protected against foreseeable risks. A well-documented insurance strategy that reflects current modeling standards is increasingly part of what sophisticated capital providers expect to see.
For C&I organizations developing distributed generation assets or evaluating solar as part of a broader energy strategy, the principles are the same even if the scale is different. Rooftop and ground-mount commercial solar projects face storm exposure too, and the quality of coverage available depends on how well the risk has been characterized from the start.
The Broader Trend Toward Risk-Informed Solar Finance
The launch of a dedicated storm catastrophe model for solar is part of a broader shift in how the energy and insurance industries are thinking about physical climate risk. As the installed base of solar assets grows, and as severe weather patterns become more variable, the demand for precise risk data is only going to increase.
This isn’t just an insurance industry story. It connects directly to how solar projects are financed, how corporate energy procurement is structured, and how independent power producers manage the long-term performance of their portfolios. Accurate risk modeling underpins all of it.
The developers and asset owners who will benefit most are the ones who treat risk assessment as a first-order design input rather than a compliance step. That means building relationships with insurers and risk consultants earlier in the development cycle, understanding what models are being used to price their specific assets, and making engineering decisions with insurance outcomes in mind.
Solar energy’s role in corporate energy strategy and grid decarbonization is well established at this point. The work now is making projects more financeable, more resilient, and better protected against the physical risks that come with operating large infrastructure assets in a variable climate. Better storm modeling is one piece of that work, and it’s a meaningful one.
Start the Risk Conversation Before You Break Ground
The projects that perform best over a 20 or 25 year life tend to be the ones where risk was taken seriously from the beginning. Not as an obstacle, but as information. Storm catastrophe modeling gives the industry better information, and that’s worth building into your development process now.
If you’re evaluating a solar project or reviewing the insurance strategy for an existing portfolio, it’s worth asking whether your current coverage reflects the precision that newer modeling tools can provide. The market is moving, and early movers will have more options.
What One Company’s Q1 2026 Earnings Call Tells C&I Energy Buyers About What’s Coming Next
May 20, 2025
When one of the largest utility holding companies in the United States reports earnings, it’s worth reading past the financial headlines. Southern Company’s Q1 2026 earnings call wasn’t just a conversation for investors. It was a window into where the Southeast’s energy infrastructure is heading, and how fast.
For commercial and industrial energy buyers, the signals in that call carry real planning implications. Rate pressures, load growth from data centers and manufacturing, grid capacity constraints, and accelerating clean energy procurement all came up. If your organization operates facilities in Southern Company territory or adjacent markets, this is a good moment to think carefully about your energy strategy.
Load Growth Is Back, and It’s Putting Pressure on Everyone
Southern Company flagged significant load growth projections driven by large industrial customers, hyperscale data centers, and economic development activity across Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Florida. That kind of demand surge is good news for the utility’s revenue story. For everyone else on the grid, it means more competition for capacity.
When industrial load grows faster than generation and transmission infrastructure can keep up, you get tighter reserve margins, higher peak demand charges, and more exposure to price volatility. Utilities are required to serve load, but they’re not required to do it cheaply during constrained periods.
For C&I customers, the response to this dynamic isn’t to wait and see. Organizations that have behind-the-meter solar and battery storage in place before regional grid stress peaks are in a structurally better position. They’ve already reduced their exposure to demand charges, they have backup capacity if the grid gets strained, and they’re not scrambling to procure clean energy when everyone else is doing the same thing.
The load growth story in the Southeast isn’t new, but the pace is accelerating. That changes the math on how much time you actually have to evaluate and develop distributed generation assets.
Capital Investment at Scale Means Rate Increases Are Coming
Southern Company outlined a substantial multi-year capital investment plan to expand and modernize its grid infrastructure. That investment is necessary. The grid needs upgrades to handle new load, integrate more renewables, and improve resilience. But utility capital spending gets recovered through rates.
Put simply, when a utility spends billions expanding infrastructure, customers pay for it over time through higher tariffs. Southern’s management was direct about the relationship between investment and rate recovery in the earnings call. That’s not a criticism. It’s how regulated utilities work.
What it means for your organization is that the baseline cost of grid electricity in Southern territory is likely to rise over the planning horizon. The exact magnitude depends on regulatory outcomes, but the direction is clear. Locking in a portion of your energy supply through a long-term power purchase agreement or owned solar generation now provides a real hedge against that trajectory.
A well-structured PPA or on-site generation asset gives you cost certainty. That’s not a secondary benefit. For operations and finance teams trying to model energy costs over five to ten years, cost certainty is often worth as much as the actual per-kWh savings.
Clean Energy Procurement Competition Is Getting More Intense
Southern Company’s earnings commentary touched on the growing demand for clean energy from large commercial and industrial customers. Data center operators, manufacturers, and corporations with Scope 2 emissions targets are all competing for the same renewable energy resources in the same geography.
That competition affects more than just pricing. It affects queue position, interconnection timelines, and the availability of high-quality projects. Utilities and independent developers are working to bring new capacity online, but interconnection queues in PJM, SERC, and FRCC regions are backed up. Projects that seemed straightforward a few years ago are facing longer development timelines.
Organizations that start their renewable procurement process early are better positioned to secure capacity before the market tightens further. That means beginning site assessments, feasibility studies, and utility coordination well ahead of your target in-service date. A project you want operating in 2028 realistically needs to be in development now.
Waiting until your sustainability commitments have a deadline looming puts you at a disadvantage on price, on timeline, and on project quality. The C&I customers getting the best outcomes right now are the ones who treated clean energy procurement as a two-to-three year process, not a six-month procurement exercise.
Battery Storage Is Becoming a Strategic Asset, Not Just a Backup Option
Battery energy storage came up in Southern’s Q1 discussion in the context of grid reliability and peak management. That framing reflects a broader shift in how storage is being used across the Southeast. BESS is no longer primarily a backup power tool. It’s becoming a core component of how organizations manage their grid exposure and energy costs.
For C&I customers in Southern territory, the case for paired solar-plus-storage has strengthened considerably. Demand charge management alone can generate significant savings for facilities with high peak loads. Add in time-of-use optimization, resilience during outages, and the ability to participate in emerging demand response programs, and the economics of storage have materially improved.
There’s also an incentive dimension that deserves attention. The federal Investment Tax Credit under the Inflation Reduction Act applies to standalone battery storage as well as solar-paired systems. State-level incentives and utility programs in Southern territory add another layer. But incentive structures evolve, and capturing the full value of available credits requires proper project structuring and timing.
Working with an experienced IPP that understands both the technical design requirements and the incentive optimization process matters here. Getting the interconnection application right, sizing the system correctly for your load profile, and structuring the financing to capture tax benefits all require coordination that takes time to do well.
The Carbon Credit Opportunity Shouldn’t Be an Afterthought
One dimension of the Southern earnings narrative that deserves more attention from C&I energy buyers is the carbon accounting story. As utilities in the Southeast continue their own clean energy transitions, the voluntary carbon market and renewable energy certificate frameworks are evolving in parallel.
Organizations that own or host renewable generation assets have options. Depending on how a project is structured, the renewable energy certificates generated can be retained for Scope 2 reporting purposes, sold into voluntary markets, or used to meet contractual sustainability commitments. The strategic value of RECs depends heavily on market timing and organizational goals, but either way, understanding your options early is better than discovering them after the fact.
For companies with published net-zero or science-based targets, the carbon accounting implications of your energy procurement decisions need to be part of the evaluation from the start. That means aligning your energy team with your sustainability team before you sign anything. In our experience, organizations that treat energy procurement and sustainability reporting as separate workstreams often leave value on the table.
Planning Now Puts You Ahead of the Constraints That Are Already Building
Southern Company’s Q1 2026 earnings call described a utility operating at the intersection of growing demand, significant capital deployment, and an accelerating clean energy transition. Those are exactly the conditions that reward early movers and penalize organizations that wait for perfect certainty before acting.
The grid infrastructure constraints, rate trajectories, and clean energy procurement dynamics described in that earnings report are not abstract future risks. They’re already showing up in project timelines, interconnection queues, and energy contract negotiations across the Southeast.
If your organization hasn’t done a current-state assessment of your energy procurement strategy, your grid exposure, and your distributed generation options, that’s a reasonable place to start. Not because there’s urgency for urgency’s sake, but because the lead times for solar, storage, and carbon credit projects mean that decisions made (or deferred) today shape what’s available to you in 2027 and beyond.
BioStar Renewables works with C&I organizations to evaluate distributed generation, BESS, and carbon credit opportunities across the Southeast and beyond. If you want to talk through what Southern Company’s growth trajectory means for your specific facilities and energy goals, we’re happy to have that conversation.
New Jersey Is Fast-Tracking Solar and Storage.
Here’s What That Means for C&I Energy Strategy.
Here’s What That Means for C&I Energy Strategy.
May 5, 2025
Energy costs are squeezing commercial and industrial budgets across the Northeast, and utilities aren’t offering much relief. Against that backdrop, New Jersey’s Board of Public Utilities is doing something worth paying attention to: actively restructuring how solar and storage projects get built, permitted, and recovered — and doing it with speed.
For C&I organizations operating in or near New Jersey, that shift isn’t just policy news. It’s a concrete change in project economics and timelines that should factor into how you’re planning your energy strategy right now.
What the New Jersey BPU Is Actually Doing
New Jersey BPU President Christine Guhl-Sadovy recently outlined a strategy that treats energy affordability not as a vague long-term goal, but as an operational problem requiring structural fixes. The approach has three legs: expedited permitting for solar and storage projects, reforms to how costs get recovered across state, regional, and federal frameworks, and faster interconnection access for distributed generation.
That last point matters more than it might seem. Interconnection queues have been one of the most stubborn obstacles to bringing clean energy projects online in the mid-Atlantic region. Delays at the grid connection stage can stretch a project timeline by a year or more, which in turn pushes out the point at which a business actually starts seeing savings. When a state regulator commits to reducing those delays, the math on a C&I solar or BESS project changes meaningfully.
The cost recovery reforms are equally significant. New Jersey is pushing for changes at multiple levels of the regulatory stack — not just state policy, but also at the regional grid operator level and through federal channels. That signals a serious, coordinated effort rather than a single legislative gesture. For businesses evaluating whether the regulatory environment will support their investment over a 15 to 20-year project life, that kind of institutional commitment matters.
Why Permitting Speed Changes the Business Case
Permitting has always been one of the quieter killers of clean energy project ROI. A well-structured solar or BESS project can look compelling on paper and then bleed value through months of back-and-forth with local jurisdictions, utility interconnection teams, and state agencies. That’s true even in markets that are nominally supportive of clean energy.
When a state moves to streamline that process, a few things happen. Project timelines compress, which means your capital starts generating returns sooner. Carrying costs drop. The uncertainty window that makes CFOs nervous gets smaller. And for projects that depend on pairing solar with battery storage to maximize demand charge reduction or participate in grid services programs, getting both assets online together becomes more achievable.
For C&I organizations that have been sitting on a clean energy project because the timeline felt too long or the approval process too unpredictable, a more favorable permitting environment is a reason to revisit that calculus. Projects that looked marginal eighteen months ago may look quite different today — particularly when you factor in the current federal incentive structure and the added value of storage for operational resilience.
There’s also a competitive timing dimension here. Favorable regulatory environments tend to attract project developers, installers, and equipment suppliers. Early movers typically get better contractor availability, more competitive pricing, and stronger site selection options. That advantage narrows as the market fills in.
The BESS Opportunity in a Fast-Moving Market
Battery energy storage deserves specific attention in the context of what New Jersey is pursuing. Storage is central to the BPU’s strategy precisely because it addresses two problems at once: it supports grid stability, and it gives commercial customers a tool to reduce their exposure to peak demand charges and time-of-use rate volatility.
For a C&I facility running significant electrical loads — a distribution center, a manufacturing plant, a large office campus — a well-sized BESS system can reduce monthly utility costs by shifting when you draw from the grid. Pair that with on-site solar generation, and you’re looking at a system that actively manages your energy spend rather than just offsetting a portion of your consumption.
New Jersey’s push for faster interconnection also benefits storage-only projects, not just solar plus storage configurations. Some facilities aren’t well-suited for rooftop or ground-mounted solar but can still benefit substantially from a standalone BESS installation. Interconnection delays have historically been a friction point for those projects too. Faster queue processing and clearer grid access pathways make the project development process more predictable for any storage application.
The state also has active programs supporting energy storage deployment, and the current federal investment tax credit structure still applies to standalone storage under the Inflation Reduction Act. That combination of state-level support and federal incentives won’t remain static forever. Evaluating storage options now, while both incentive frameworks are in place and the permitting environment is improving, gives you the best chance of capturing full project value.
What C&I Leaders in the Northeast Should Do Right Now
The most practical takeaway from New Jersey’s regulatory direction isn’t to wait and see how things develop. It’s to start your internal evaluation process now, before the external environment does the work for you.
That means a few concrete things. First, if you have facilities in New Jersey or nearby markets, get a current site assessment done. Understand what solar capacity your properties can support, what your demand charge exposure looks like, and whether your utility rate structure makes BESS a strong candidate. These assessments aren’t commitments — they’re the information you need to make a decision with confidence.
Second, review your interconnection situation. If you’ve had previous discussions with your utility about grid connection for a DG project that stalled, it may be worth reopening those conversations. The regulatory pressure New Jersey is applying to utilities on interconnection timelines can shift what’s possible at the project level.
Third, talk to your finance and tax teams about the current incentive picture. The federal investment tax credit, depreciation treatment, and any available state-level incentives all interact. Getting that analysis done before you’re under time pressure gives you more flexibility in how you structure a deal — whether that’s a direct ownership model, a power purchase agreement, or a third-party lease arrangement.
Finally, don’t underestimate the value of operational resilience in your energy planning. Grid reliability in the Northeast has been under stress. C&I organizations that have experienced significant outages in recent years are increasingly treating storage not just as a cost management tool but as a business continuity asset. A BESS system that reduces your peak demand charges also gives you backup capacity during grid disruptions. That dual value proposition is worth quantifying.
The Broader Signal for Sustainability Strategy
New Jersey’s approach reflects something happening more broadly in energy policy: state regulators are recognizing that affordable, clean energy requires active structural intervention, not just incentive programs layered on top of a slow-moving system. Permitting reform, interconnection modernization, and multi-level cost recovery changes are the kinds of moves that actually shift project timelines and economics.
For sustainability leaders, that’s meaningful context. Corporate clean energy commitments don’t get met by setting targets — they get met by executing projects. And projects get executed when the regulatory environment, the financing structure, and the internal organizational readiness all align. New Jersey is actively working on its side of that equation. The question is whether your organization is working on its side.
C&I energy strategy doesn’t reward hesitation. It rewards preparation. The companies that move through site evaluation, interconnection discussions, and financial structuring before a project becomes urgent are the ones that tend to lock in better terms, better timelines, and better long-term outcomes.
If you’re operating in the Northeast and haven’t taken a serious look at distributed generation and storage in the past twelve months, the regulatory environment New Jersey is building is a good reason to start that conversation.
FTI and BioStar Renewables Collaborate to Support Clean Energy Infrastructure Nationwide
KANSAS CITY, Mo. —Faith Technologies Incorporated™ (FTI), a national leader in engineering, construction, manufacturing and clean energy is working with BioStar Renewables to support the development and delivery of clean energy infrastructure projects across the United States.
The collaboration brings FTI’s capabilities in engineering, manufacturing and electrical infrastructure together with BioStar’s experience in developing, financing and operating energy projects. The result is greater support for the deployment of solar, battery storage and next-generation energy systems for customers seeking reliable, scalable solutions.
Practical, Scalable Energy
Demand for resilient, affordable renewable energy continues to grow as organizations look to strengthen operations, manage long-term energy costs and meet sustainability goals. In 2025, U.S. electricity demand rose by about 3.1% — one of the largest annual increases in recent years. Solar generation also increased about 27% over 2024 and met roughly 61% of the nation’s electricity demand growth, which shows the increasing role of renewable resources in meeting overall energy needs. Customers want solutions they can trust with systems that perform reliably, reduce long-term operating costs and support sustainability commitments without adding complexity.
“FTI and BioStar share a commitment to innovation and excellence,” said Charlie Fredrickson, executive vice president with FTI. “That alignment helps customers move forward with confidence as they invest in renewable energy infrastructure built to perform over the long term.”
“Our relationship with FTI is about making clean energy more accessible and more achievable for the customers that need it most, especially in a market that is demanding speed and reliability,” said Bill Love, CEO, BioStar Renewables. “By uniting our teams, we’re able to deliver projects that are thoughtful in design, efficient to build and dependable for decades.”
Love added, “My relationship with FTI spans more than three decades, and when choosing a long-term partner to complement our origination and development business, FTI was the obvious choice. In a market that is demanding speed, creativity, and reliability, we knew that FTI’s reputation, capabilities and ethics were well suited for a long-term partnership.”
Experience and Vision
The partnership is strengthened by a proven history of collaboration and shared values. FTI and BioStar have worked together on multiple clean energy projects, including a solar and energy storage microgrid currently under construction for MasterCard’s data center in O’Fallon, Mo. This collaboration is further supported by deep electrical expertise rooted in Bill Love’s founding of SKC Electric and its later integration into FTI, bringing complementary skillsets and aligned values that enhance the value proposition for customers.
Through this collaboration, customers benefit from coordinated expertise across key areas, including:
- Engineering, procurement and construction of distributed energy microgrids and battery energy storage systems (BESS)
- Electrical infrastructure design and installation, including EV charging and fleet adoption support
- Project financing and long-term ownership models that foster long-term relationships with customers
- Ongoing performance monitoring, maintenance and optimization ensuring that assets perform maximally for the entirety of their useful life
- Support in achieving decarbonization, resilience and sustainability goals amid tight timelines
This vertically integrated approach helps reduce complexity, streamline delivery and ensure systems are designed with both performance and practicality in mind.
From Fortune 500 campuses to municipalities and school districts, customers are seeking dependable clean energy solutions that strengthen their operations. FTI and BioStar are currently supporting clean energy projects across the country to meet that growing demand.
For more information on FTI and its services, visit faithtechinc.com.
# # #
About BioStar Renewables
BioStar Renewables is a national leader in clean energy development, EPC services and long-term asset operations. We help organizations reduce energy costs, improve resilience and meet sustainability goals through practical, high-performance renewable energy solutions. Learn more at BioStarRenewables.com.
Infocast’s Projects & Money Conference Signals Confidence in Solar and Storage Industry
At BioStar Renewables, we’re encouraged by the conversations coming out of Infocast’s Projects & Money Conference, which reinforced what we’re seeing across our own development and financing efforts: solar and energy storage have entered a more mature, fundamentals-driven phase. The emphasis on disciplined capital deployment, execution certainty, and long-term value closely aligns with how we approach project development.
Looking ahead, we’re excited to continue the conversation at Infocast’s upcoming Solar + Wind Finance & Investment Conference in Phoenix, AZ, March 15 – 18. As developers, investors, and capital providers dig deeper into how renewable projects are financed and scaled, we see these discussions as critical to advancing bankable, resilient clean energy infrastructure nationwide.
Did You Know Solar Power Generation Doesn’t Stop For Snow
How Solar Keeps Performing During Winter and Snowfall
Cold Weather Isn’t the Problem—Design Is the Difference
How Tracking Technology Helps Solar Perform in Snow
Real-World Example: Westtown School, Pennsylvania
How Far Solar Technology Has Come
Where the Technology Is Going
Why Winter Performance Matters
Solar Is Built for All Seasons
##
Westtown School Solar Project Fact Sheet
The Westtown School solar project features a 2.013MW system delivering more than 3 million kWh of clean energy each year. Designed to offset approximately 90% of the school’s electricity use, this system significantly reduces environmental impact—equivalent to removing 275 gas-powered vehicles from the road and powering 159 homes annually.
Learn more about this project here.
Hallmark Solar Project Fact Sheet
Hallmark’s 979 kW solar installation produces over 1.3 million kWh annually, helping reduce electricity demand by roughly 10%. This project delivers meaningful sustainability benefits, including a reduction of 39 metric tons of CO2 each year and environmental savings equal to 4,430 gallons of gasoline.
Learn more about this project here.
Seaboard Energy Solar Project Fact Sheet
Seaboard Energy’s 15MW solar project located in Hugoton, KS produces over 30 million kWh annually, delivering major environmental and economic value. With an impact equal to displacing 21,000 metric tons of CO2 every year, this system generates enough clean energy to power roughly 3,000 homes and offset more than 3.3 million gallons of gasoline.
Learn more about this project here.
City of Norman, OK Solar Project Fact Sheet
This 2.27MW solar installation in Norman, Oklahoma generates more than 3.4 million kWh per year, lowering the city’s utility-supplied electricity needs by approximately 30%. The project provides substantial carbon reductions—equivalent to 2,484 metric tons of CO2—and energy savings comparable to the electricity use of 439 homes.
Learn more about this project here.